Isidro Maya Jariego: Redes Sociales - LRPC (Laboratorio de Redes Personales. y Comunidades)

Ir a WebIr a Blog
de libros
Reseñas en PsycCRITIQUES
portda de libro

Economic Justice in an Unfair World. Toward a Level Playing Field

Resumen:
In the summer of 2000 I attended the seminar entitled “Development in the International Political Economy” in the London School of Economics. As in other courses with a similar content around the world, Economic Development by Michael P. Todaro was the core textbook. Thousands of students have learned the basics of development with the guide of professor Todaro. This best-seller –now in its 9th Edition with the coauthorship of Stephen C. Smith- was originally published in 1977. Since the first edition, the success of the handbook is greatly based in a sincere effort to introduce the economics of development addressing the real problems of poor countries in Africa, Asia and Latin-America. The book Economic Justice in an Unfair World, by Ethan B. Kapstein, follows those prescriptions of pertinence and justice that were significantly deployed in the social sciences during the 1970s. It clearly states that the “global economy operates in a way that is fundamentally unfair, particularly to developing countries and the poor within them” (p. 1). Then it confirms that “the international trade regime remains firmly tilted against developing countries in important respects” (p. 22). (...)

  • Maya Jariego, I. (2007, February 14). Between human rights and sovereignty: an internationalist approach to development [Book Review of the book Economic Justice in an Unfair World. Toward a Level Playing Field]. PsycCRITIQUES-Contemporary Psychology: APA Review of Books. 52 (No.7), Article 6. Retrieved [15-02-2007], from the PsycCRITIQUES database.

“The debate on migration has seen the confrontation between the principles of human rights and national sovereignty. Both correspond, respectively, to the cosmopolitan and the communitarian perspectives. One assumes that free migration is likely to reduce inequalities between peoples from different countries, while the other is particularly concerned with the impact of migration on welfare states. The first takes a global view, while the second takes the nation-state as reference. The novelty of the liberal internationalist approach is to take into account the domestic social compact and the role of the international community at the same time.”

[Read more in PsycCRITIQUES: http://www.apa.org/psyccritiques/]

  • WAI - AA
  • CSS
  • XHTML